Legions of feminists in academia, governmental institutions, and on the Internet are undergoing a crusade against male supremacy. They want to dismantle men’s domination of all intuitions. However, few of them acknowledge that one of these institutions, the government—which grants them their “equal” rights and free abortions—is entirely supported by male taxpayers. In terms of total contribution, women take a lot more money from the state than they provide. To put it boldly, the government, supported by working men, is paying women to be alive.
These “strong independent women” that “don’t need men” are only that way because the state is transferring men’s hard earned money to them. Feminists are not seriously against being dependent on men, they just oppose men having control over their money.
Western women are proud to pay their own bill on a date. How about you pay your own taxes instead?
The real gender gap: the tax gap
Let’s explore a fiscal research report in New Zealand.
While the “wage gap”, the “pink tax”, and expensive pink razors have been under the spotlight for the past years, the massive tax gap has never been mentioned. A quick glimpse at the data reveals massive disparities in the amount of taxes paid by men and women, at all ages.
Women consciously choose to work part-time, to have higher rates of absenteeism, to accept a low salary, etc. As a result, their tax contribution is at least twice lower than that of men. That is even in the age groups in which women rarely take care of children. Besides, you pay taxes on paid maternity leave, so being responsible for children remains a personal choice.
In nearly all age groups, women receive more tax than they give
Women also use a lot more services. Remember that women’s rights are far beyond “equal rights”. Feminism is now about providing women with services (paid by men), which lowers women’s overall fiscal contribution. For instance: healthcare, income assist, education, and all kinds of programs. Women use the vast majority of these services.
Exception for the age group between 45-59 (a 15 year span), women receive more benefits from the state than than what they pay for, on a yearly basis. In contrast, men generate more tax revenue than what they use at every age between 23 and 65 (a 43 year span). In the brief period in which women have a positive fiscal contribution, men outscore them by at least 3 times.
This brief period of profitability is not even enough to pay for their two first years in this world.
Note that this figure did not make mention of the monumental costs attached to women’s groups. While the use of services is accounted for in this figure, feminist groups benefits from billions yearly, which are unaccounted for in this figure.
By the end of her life, the average woman will have a negative fiscal impact of $150,000
By large, the cumulative tax money given to women outweighs the tax money generated by women. The short period of positive impact of women between 45 and 59 is countered by 65 other years in which their allocated tax expenditure is more than what they supply the state.
Men, on the other hand, appear to have a positive cumulative net fiscal impact from approximately 40 until 80 years of age. For these particular taxes and public expenditures, the net fiscal incidence on men is approximately zero when cumulated over all ages. (p. 22)
Overall, the research suggests that only men pay taxes. Thus, every time women fight for “equal rights”, they are demanding that you pay for the government to protect her from you.
While feminists are demonizing men for benefiting from all liberties and rights they have constructed, they have oddly remained silent over the fact that anonymous male tax payers are paying women to exist.
The fact that feminists want a stronger government is not a coincidence. While historically, women had to choose a wealthy husband for resources, they can now stay single, be lesbians, marry a poor man, or use the sperm bank, and the state will still transfer male taxes to them. Interestingly, within 10 years of women’s suffrage, the government doubled their tax revenue and expenditure in the USA. The government has somehow become the new providing husband, by taking money from anonymous men who have no say about their money. While women are still strongly financially dependent on men, men are simply unable to use the money they make for their own interests.
Taxes is discrimination against men. Discrimination by adverse impact occurs when a system disproportionately affect one group. This is why IQ scores are a legal nightmare in the hiring process—it disproportionately impacts certain minorities. From a legal perspective, taxes are discrimination because it primarily impacts men.
You support equality? Fine, pay for it.